<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 574 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160838</link>
    <description>Revisional power could not be used to cancel a completed assessment and direct a fresh assessment where the statutory remedy lay in reassessment of escaped turnover. Applying its earlier distinction between reassessment and revision, the Gauhati High Court held that the revisional authority had crossed the limits of section 36 by enquiring into the dealer&#039;s business affairs and trenching upon the reassessment field. The revisional notice and consequential order were therefore without jurisdiction and were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2013 15:03:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 574 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160838</link>
      <description>Revisional power could not be used to cancel a completed assessment and direct a fresh assessment where the statutory remedy lay in reassessment of escaped turnover. Applying its earlier distinction between reassessment and revision, the Gauhati High Court held that the revisional authority had crossed the limits of section 36 by enquiring into the dealer&#039;s business affairs and trenching upon the reassessment field. The revisional notice and consequential order were therefore without jurisdiction and were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>