https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160837 A decision rendered without affording a party a reasonable opportunity of hearing cannot be sustained. The Gauhati HC found that the writ petitioner was not heard when the writ petition was disposed of because counsel was absent, and it did not examine the merits of the tax dispute. To secure the ends of justice, the impugned judgment was set aside and the writ petition was remanded to the learned single Judge for fresh hearing and disposal in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 06 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2013 14:36:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160837 A decision rendered without affording a party a reasonable opportunity of hearing cannot be sustained. The Gauhati HC found that the writ petitioner was not heard when the writ petition was disposed of because counsel was absent, and it did not examine the merits of the tax dispute. To secure the ends of justice, the impugned judgment was set aside and the writ petition was remanded to the learned single Judge for fresh hearing and disposal in accordance with law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 06 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160837