<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 808 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160820</link>
    <description>Compulsory deduction of tax at source from the entire contract amount was invalid to the extent it applied to turnover relating to inter-State sales, outside sales, and sales in the course of import. The Kerala HC held that the State&#039;s taxing power under the KGST Act is confined to taxable turnover within its competence, and a deduction mechanism cannot operate on amounts it has no power to tax, even provisionally. Because the amended provision did not permit effective segregation of non-taxable turnover at the deduction stage, section 7(7B) and rule 22A(2) were held ultra vires insofar as they authorised deduction from non-taxable turnover.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:57:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 808 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160820</link>
      <description>Compulsory deduction of tax at source from the entire contract amount was invalid to the extent it applied to turnover relating to inter-State sales, outside sales, and sales in the course of import. The Kerala HC held that the State&#039;s taxing power under the KGST Act is confined to taxable turnover within its competence, and a deduction mechanism cannot operate on amounts it has no power to tax, even provisionally. Because the amended provision did not permit effective segregation of non-taxable turnover at the deduction stage, section 7(7B) and rule 22A(2) were held ultra vires insofar as they authorised deduction from non-taxable turnover.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>