https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241516 The court upheld the restoration of the original penalty imposed on the petitioner under the KGST Act, citing discrepancies in the petitioner's accounts. The learned Single Judge partially allowed the writ petition, requiring reconsideration of the unaccounted sales of cenex. The court acknowledged the 3rd respondent's authority to initiate proceedings under Section 45A of the KGST Act and upheld most findings by the authorities and the Single Judge. The petitioner's request for further scrutiny was denied, and the writ appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision based on the evidence and legal analysis presented. en-us Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2013 07:00:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241516 The court upheld the restoration of the original penalty imposed on the petitioner under the KGST Act, citing discrepancies in the petitioner's accounts. The learned Single Judge partially allowed the writ petition, requiring reconsideration of the unaccounted sales of cenex. The court acknowledged the 3rd respondent's authority to initiate proceedings under Section 45A of the KGST Act and upheld most findings by the authorities and the Single Judge. The petitioner's request for further scrutiny was denied, and the writ appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision based on the evidence and legal analysis presented. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241516