https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241515 The judgment addressed 22 applications seeking waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery against adjudged dues related to service tax. It found a prima facie case in favor of the appellants based on similarities to previous stay orders, directing lower authorities to consider appeals on merits without insisting on pre-deposit. The judgment differentiated cases based on compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, granting waiver for some and remanding others for proper consideration. It emphasized the importance of legal support and categorized cases for specific treatment, ensuring fairness and adherence to legal procedures. en-us Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2013 07:00:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241515 The judgment addressed 22 applications seeking waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery against adjudged dues related to service tax. It found a prima facie case in favor of the appellants based on similarities to previous stay orders, directing lower authorities to consider appeals on merits without insisting on pre-deposit. The judgment differentiated cases based on compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, granting waiver for some and remanding others for proper consideration. It emphasized the importance of legal support and categorized cases for specific treatment, ensuring fairness and adherence to legal procedures. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241515