https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241507 The tribunal concluded that the appellant was unable to discharge their service tax liability on GTA services received post-19-4-2006 through Cenvat credit. The service tax liability had to be settled through PLA only, as the GTA services did not qualify as output services under Rule 2(p) without a customer or client involvement. The tribunal upheld the impugned order, emphasizing compliance with updated regulations for service tax liabilities and dismissing the appeal. en-us Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2013 06:59:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241507 The tribunal concluded that the appellant was unable to discharge their service tax liability on GTA services received post-19-4-2006 through Cenvat credit. The service tax liability had to be settled through PLA only, as the GTA services did not qualify as output services under Rule 2(p) without a customer or client involvement. The tribunal upheld the impugned order, emphasizing compliance with updated regulations for service tax liabilities and dismissing the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241507