<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1145 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241480</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the confiscation of imported Oats lacking essential details for local laws compliance. The decision permitted repacking in customs bonded premises with necessary labeling and testing by Port health authorities before customs clearance. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to certification requirements for imported goods, the judgment balanced consumer safety with legal compliance, ultimately allowing repacking under controlled conditions to rectify missing information.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2013 06:56:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1145 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241480</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the confiscation of imported Oats lacking essential details for local laws compliance. The decision permitted repacking in customs bonded premises with necessary labeling and testing by Port health authorities before customs clearance. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to certification requirements for imported goods, the judgment balanced consumer safety with legal compliance, ultimately allowing repacking under controlled conditions to rectify missing information.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>