<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1137 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241472</link>
    <description>Where capital goods and a storage tank installed on an adjacent plot had merged with the factory premises, the Tribunal treated that integration as supporting a prima facie entitlement to CENVAT credit. On that footing, it dispensed with pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty and stayed recovery during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2013 06:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1137 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241472</link>
      <description>Where capital goods and a storage tank installed on an adjacent plot had merged with the factory premises, the Tribunal treated that integration as supporting a prima facie entitlement to CENVAT credit. On that footing, it dispensed with pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty and stayed recovery during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>