<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1134 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241469</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on inputs used to manufacture capital goods was treated as prima facie sustainable, because the alleged double benefit arose from depreciation claimed on the capital goods themselves, not on the inputs. The show-cause notice did not allege that credit on those inputs was inadmissible. On that basis, the demand was regarded as prima facie unsustainable and pre-deposit was waived pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2013 06:55:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1134 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241469</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on inputs used to manufacture capital goods was treated as prima facie sustainable, because the alleged double benefit arose from depreciation claimed on the capital goods themselves, not on the inputs. The show-cause notice did not allege that credit on those inputs was inadmissible. On that basis, the demand was regarded as prima facie unsustainable and pre-deposit was waived pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>