<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 895 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160801</link>
    <description>A subsequent appellate order confirming an assessment, when left undisturbed in revision, prevails over an earlier remand order and bars the assessing authority from reopening the completed assessment. On that footing, the Tribunal noted that a subsisting demand remained against the assessee, so the garnishee notice issued under section 57 of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994 could not be invalidated merely by reference to the earlier remand. As no independent illegality or lack of jurisdiction was established in the garnishee proceeding, the challenge failed and the Tribunal declined interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 17:55:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 895 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160801</link>
      <description>A subsequent appellate order confirming an assessment, when left undisturbed in revision, prevails over an earlier remand order and bars the assessing authority from reopening the completed assessment. On that footing, the Tribunal noted that a subsisting demand remained against the assessee, so the garnishee notice issued under section 57 of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994 could not be invalidated merely by reference to the earlier remand. As no independent illegality or lack of jurisdiction was established in the garnishee proceeding, the challenge failed and the Tribunal declined interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>