<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 758 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160791</link>
    <description>Turnover attributable to dies and tools manufactured and retained within the assessee&#039;s premises was held outside the scope of inter-State sale treatment under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, because there was no movement of those goods outside the State. The court treated the absence of inter-State movement as decisive for section 3 applicability and held that the related turnover was not exigible to CST. The revision was dismissed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 16:53:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 758 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160791</link>
      <description>Turnover attributable to dies and tools manufactured and retained within the assessee&#039;s premises was held outside the scope of inter-State sale treatment under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, because there was no movement of those goods outside the State. The court treated the absence of inter-State movement as decisive for section 3 applicability and held that the related turnover was not exigible to CST. The revision was dismissed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>