<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1084 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160788</link>
    <description>An eligibility certificate granting entry tax exemption could not be cancelled retrospectively after the exemption period had expired and the dealer had already fully availed the benefit. The High Court applied the principle that, once the defined exemption period is over and the concession has been enjoyed, the State lacks authority to unsettle that benefit by a later retrospective cancellation; at most, any permissible cancellation during the currency of the period could operate only prospectively. The retrospective cancellation was therefore invalid, and the order quashing the certificate was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 16:45:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1084 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160788</link>
      <description>An eligibility certificate granting entry tax exemption could not be cancelled retrospectively after the exemption period had expired and the dealer had already fully availed the benefit. The High Court applied the principle that, once the defined exemption period is over and the concession has been enjoyed, the State lacks authority to unsettle that benefit by a later retrospective cancellation; at most, any permissible cancellation during the currency of the period could operate only prospectively. The retrospective cancellation was therefore invalid, and the order quashing the certificate was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>