<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 980 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160784</link>
    <description>Once a competent authority has taken and communicated a decision conferring a benefit, and that decision has neither been withdrawn nor lawfully superseded, mandamus can compel its implementation. The High Court applied this principle to an amended eligibility certificate for an extended tax deferment benefit, noting that the petitioner had completed the required formalities and that pendency of other subsidy-related matters was not a valid ground to refuse the certificate. The court directed issuance of the certificate within the stipulated time, enforcing the already approved benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 16:34:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 980 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160784</link>
      <description>Once a competent authority has taken and communicated a decision conferring a benefit, and that decision has neither been withdrawn nor lawfully superseded, mandamus can compel its implementation. The High Court applied this principle to an amended eligibility certificate for an extended tax deferment benefit, noting that the petitioner had completed the required formalities and that pendency of other subsidy-related matters was not a valid ground to refuse the certificate. The court directed issuance of the certificate within the stipulated time, enforcing the already approved benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>