https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160769 An error of law is shown on the face of an award only when the award or an incorporated document discloses the legal proposition said to be mistaken; a reasonless lump sum award does not justify re-examination of the merits. A formal correction to an issue description is not misconduct where it merely aligns the wording with the claim and causes no prejudice. In an arbitration arising out of a suit, where pendente lite interest is one of the referred disputes, the arbitrator may award such interest as a court could under Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. On that basis, the award was upheld. en-us Fri, 19 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Aug 2014 10:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160769 An error of law is shown on the face of an award only when the award or an incorporated document discloses the legal proposition said to be mistaken; a reasonless lump sum award does not justify re-examination of the merits. A formal correction to an issue description is not misconduct where it merely aligns the wording with the claim and causes no prejudice. In an arbitration arising out of a suit, where pendente lite interest is one of the referred disputes, the arbitrator may award such interest as a court could under Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. On that basis, the award was upheld. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 19 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160769