https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160767 An award was held to disclose an error on its face where it declared that dismissal had no effect and that the employee continued in service. If enforced, that declaration would have compelled the employer to treat the claimant as still employed, amounting to specific enforcement of a contract of personal service, which the law prohibits. A facial error exists when the award itself, or an incorporated document, states a plainly erroneous legal proposition. The argument that the impugned declaration was merely consequential or severable failed because it formed part of the award and was not shown to be separable. The award was therefore set aside. en-us Wed, 03 Sep 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160767 An award was held to disclose an error on its face where it declared that dismissal had no effect and that the employee continued in service. If enforced, that declaration would have compelled the employer to treat the claimant as still employed, amounting to specific enforcement of a contract of personal service, which the law prohibits. A facial error exists when the award itself, or an incorporated document, states a plainly erroneous legal proposition. The argument that the impugned declaration was merely consequential or severable failed because it formed part of the award and was not shown to be separable. The award was therefore set aside. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 03 Sep 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160767