<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1338 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160761</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petition, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and remanding the matter for reconsideration. The Court emphasized the need for a reasoned decision within three months, focusing on factors like product differences and marketability. The petitioner was granted the possibility of seeking interim relief if the proceedings exceeded the stipulated time, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:11:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1338 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160761</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petition, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and remanding the matter for reconsideration. The Court emphasized the need for a reasoned decision within three months, focusing on factors like product differences and marketability. The petitioner was granted the possibility of seeking interim relief if the proceedings exceeded the stipulated time, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>