<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 711 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160757</link>
    <description>Imported sugar was treated as covered by section 14(viii) of the Central Sales Tax Act, because the tariff sub-headings of the Central Excise Tariff Act were incorporated into that provision and operated as part of it; on that basis, imported sugar fell within the declared-goods regime and was taxable at the first sale under the pre-amendment West Bengal scheme. The West Bengal Finance Act, 1999 was described as declaratory and clarificatory in moving sugar other than India-made sugar to the single-point schedule, and its retrospective operation was upheld as a valid exercise of legislative power. The distinction between India-made and imported sugar was considered a rational tax classification and no breach of Articles 14, 301 or 304 was made out.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 12:45:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 711 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160757</link>
      <description>Imported sugar was treated as covered by section 14(viii) of the Central Sales Tax Act, because the tariff sub-headings of the Central Excise Tariff Act were incorporated into that provision and operated as part of it; on that basis, imported sugar fell within the declared-goods regime and was taxable at the first sale under the pre-amendment West Bengal scheme. The West Bengal Finance Act, 1999 was described as declaratory and clarificatory in moving sugar other than India-made sugar to the single-point schedule, and its retrospective operation was upheld as a valid exercise of legislative power. The distinction between India-made and imported sugar was considered a rational tax classification and no breach of Articles 14, 301 or 304 was made out.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>