<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (11) TMI 76 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160752</link>
    <description>Where a partnership deed prescribes a mandatory method for valuing a retiring partner&#039;s share, the arbitrator must stay within that contractual limit. The deed here required goodwill to be based on five years&#039; net profits, outstandings at 85% of book value, movable property at book value, and immovable property at purchase price or book value as recorded. By adding depreciation and appreciation of property, dead-stock and dues beyond that scheme, the arbitrator acted outside the reference. As the excess was built into the lump-sum valuation, the invalid portion was not severable and the award was liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (11) TMI 76 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160752</link>
      <description>Where a partnership deed prescribes a mandatory method for valuing a retiring partner&#039;s share, the arbitrator must stay within that contractual limit. The deed here required goodwill to be based on five years&#039; net profits, outstandings at 85% of book value, movable property at book value, and immovable property at purchase price or book value as recorded. By adding depreciation and appreciation of property, dead-stock and dues beyond that scheme, the arbitrator acted outside the reference. As the excess was built into the lump-sum valuation, the invalid portion was not severable and the award was liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>