<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 1026 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160747</link>
    <description>The amended sales tax entry prescribing different tax rates for cement depending on whether packing material was sold separately or included in the composite sale price was upheld as valid under Article 14. The Court held that the classification was based on an intelligible and rational distinction, aimed at preventing tax avoidance through bifurcation of cement and packing charges, plugging revenue leakage, and avoiding uncertainty and elaborate enquiry into the true nature of the sale. It distinguished impermissible invidious distinctions from permissible fiscal classification and confirmed that taxation statutes enjoy wide latitude so long as the classification has a nexus with the object sought to be achieved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 11:35:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 1026 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160747</link>
      <description>The amended sales tax entry prescribing different tax rates for cement depending on whether packing material was sold separately or included in the composite sale price was upheld as valid under Article 14. The Court held that the classification was based on an intelligible and rational distinction, aimed at preventing tax avoidance through bifurcation of cement and packing charges, plugging revenue leakage, and avoiding uncertainty and elaborate enquiry into the true nature of the sale. It distinguished impermissible invidious distinctions from permissible fiscal classification and confirmed that taxation statutes enjoy wide latitude so long as the classification has a nexus with the object sought to be achieved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>