<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1117 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241452</link>
    <description>The Authority determined that payments made for line production services did not qualify as &#039;Fees for Technical Services&#039; under the Income-tax Act. As the services were considered composite and not solely technical, they were classified under &#039;work contract&#039; instead. Consequently, the payments were not taxable under section 9(1)(i) and withholding tax under section 195 was not applicable. The issue of classification as &#039;Royalty&#039; was not addressed due to the conclusion on the first issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1117 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241452</link>
      <description>The Authority determined that payments made for line production services did not qualify as &#039;Fees for Technical Services&#039; under the Income-tax Act. As the services were considered composite and not solely technical, they were classified under &#039;work contract&#039; instead. Consequently, the payments were not taxable under section 9(1)(i) and withholding tax under section 195 was not applicable. The issue of classification as &#039;Royalty&#039; was not addressed due to the conclusion on the first issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>