<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1115 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241450</link>
    <description>The court determined that the variable license fee is both capital and revenue expenditure. Fees paid up to 31st July 1999 are capital, while those after 1st August 1999 are revenue. Interest on delayed license fee payments is similarly categorized, with the tribunal tasked to assess the specific period of interest payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1115 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241450</link>
      <description>The court determined that the variable license fee is both capital and revenue expenditure. Fees paid up to 31st July 1999 are capital, while those after 1st August 1999 are revenue. Interest on delayed license fee payments is similarly categorized, with the tribunal tasked to assess the specific period of interest payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>