<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1108 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241443</link>
    <description>In ITA No.1399/PN/2011, a Pvt. Ltd. Company faced penalty proceedings under section 271B for delayed audit of accounts for A.Y. 2006-07. The penalty of Rs. 1 lakh was upheld by the Tribunal due to unsubstantiated reasons provided by the appellant. Similarly, in ITA No.1400/PN/2011, the penalty was upheld based on identical circumstances. However, in ITA No.1401/PN/2011, the penalty of Rs. 23,251 for A.Y. 2007-08 was canceled as a reasonable cause was established related to unaudited accounts from the prior year. The Tribunal decisions were fact-specific, emphasizing the need for valid justifications for compliance delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1108 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241443</link>
      <description>In ITA No.1399/PN/2011, a Pvt. Ltd. Company faced penalty proceedings under section 271B for delayed audit of accounts for A.Y. 2006-07. The penalty of Rs. 1 lakh was upheld by the Tribunal due to unsubstantiated reasons provided by the appellant. Similarly, in ITA No.1400/PN/2011, the penalty was upheld based on identical circumstances. However, in ITA No.1401/PN/2011, the penalty of Rs. 23,251 for A.Y. 2007-08 was canceled as a reasonable cause was established related to unaudited accounts from the prior year. The Tribunal decisions were fact-specific, emphasizing the need for valid justifications for compliance delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>