<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 813 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160740</link>
    <description>Inter-State sales are determined by whether the movement of goods was required by, or incidental to, the contract of sale. Transport documents standing in the consignee&#039;s name are not conclusive of an intra-State transaction where the surrounding records show sale to an out-of-State buyer and movement pursuant to that buyer&#039;s instructions. On the facts, the bills, purchase orders and challans supported the assessee, while the Revenue failed to prove local delivery or the existence of a buyer firm at the alleged in-State location. The turnover was therefore treated as sales in the course of inter-State trade and commerce, and tax under the State provision did not apply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 18:35:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 813 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160740</link>
      <description>Inter-State sales are determined by whether the movement of goods was required by, or incidental to, the contract of sale. Transport documents standing in the consignee&#039;s name are not conclusive of an intra-State transaction where the surrounding records show sale to an out-of-State buyer and movement pursuant to that buyer&#039;s instructions. On the facts, the bills, purchase orders and challans supported the assessee, while the Revenue failed to prove local delivery or the existence of a buyer firm at the alleged in-State location. The turnover was therefore treated as sales in the course of inter-State trade and commerce, and tax under the State provision did not apply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>