<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 656 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160738</link>
    <description>The Court granted condonation of a 212-day delay in filing an appeal against a revised assessment order, allowing the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal on its merits. The petitioner was directed to resubmit the appeal if necessary within two weeks and to pay costs to the respondents&#039; counsel. The writ petition was allowed, and a related application was closed as no further order was necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 18:30:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 656 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160738</link>
      <description>The Court granted condonation of a 212-day delay in filing an appeal against a revised assessment order, allowing the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal on its merits. The petitioner was directed to resubmit the appeal if necessary within two weeks and to pay costs to the respondents&#039; counsel. The writ petition was allowed, and a related application was closed as no further order was necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>