<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 966 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160734</link>
    <description>Seized diary entries, loose papers and cash records were not taxable as the assessee&#039;s concealed turnover because the material was linked to the independent business of the assessee&#039;s son, a registered dealer already assessed on those transactions. Mere cash entries do not become sale transactions unless the revenue proves a nexus showing receipt as sale consideration, and no such material was produced. The High Court also declined to interfere with the Tax Board&#039;s factual findings, holding that they were based on proper appreciation of evidence and were neither perverse nor unreasonable. The additions to taxable turnover were therefore not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 18:10:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 966 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160734</link>
      <description>Seized diary entries, loose papers and cash records were not taxable as the assessee&#039;s concealed turnover because the material was linked to the independent business of the assessee&#039;s son, a registered dealer already assessed on those transactions. Mere cash entries do not become sale transactions unless the revenue proves a nexus showing receipt as sale consideration, and no such material was produced. The High Court also declined to interfere with the Tax Board&#039;s factual findings, holding that they were based on proper appreciation of evidence and were neither perverse nor unreasonable. The additions to taxable turnover were therefore not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>