<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 953 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160728</link>
    <description>Soft drinks sold in pouches were treated as &quot;bottled soft drinks&quot; under entry 91 because the term was construed broadly to cover soft drinks kept in a container functionally equivalent to a bottle, and the levy at 8 per cent was sustained. The supply of squash and fruit jam was also treated as a taxable sale because the transaction involved manufacture and supply of finished goods with separate billing for materials and labour; it was classified under the entry covering foods, including fruit preparations sold under a brand name, and the turnover was upheld as taxable under entry 103. The assessment and classification made by the tax authorities were sustained in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 17:38:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 953 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160728</link>
      <description>Soft drinks sold in pouches were treated as &quot;bottled soft drinks&quot; under entry 91 because the term was construed broadly to cover soft drinks kept in a container functionally equivalent to a bottle, and the levy at 8 per cent was sustained. The supply of squash and fruit jam was also treated as a taxable sale because the transaction involved manufacture and supply of finished goods with separate billing for materials and labour; it was classified under the entry covering foods, including fruit preparations sold under a brand name, and the turnover was upheld as taxable under entry 103. The assessment and classification made by the tax authorities were sustained in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>