https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160721 Where the taxing statute expressly barred stay of recovery of disputed sales tax during revision proceedings, the High Court held that writ jurisdiction under article 226 could not be used to bypass that prohibition. The Court found that collection was not without authority of law, no grave or undue hardship was shown, and the only relief specifically available was instalment payment under the statute. Interim stay of recovery was therefore refused, and the petitioner was left to pursue instalment relief in the revision proceedings. en-us Fri, 21 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Dec 2013 16:54:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160721 Where the taxing statute expressly barred stay of recovery of disputed sales tax during revision proceedings, the High Court held that writ jurisdiction under article 226 could not be used to bypass that prohibition. The Court found that collection was not without authority of law, no grave or undue hardship was shown, and the only relief specifically available was instalment payment under the statute. Interim stay of recovery was therefore refused, and the petitioner was left to pursue instalment relief in the revision proceedings. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 21 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160721