https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160684 The Court dismissed the petition seeking directions for payment of statutory dues/arrears of sales tax and other dues/arrears by Union of India and NSIC. The Court emphasized that the petition, essentially a money claim, did not warrant a writ petition due to factual disputes and belated claims. It highlighted the discretionary nature of writ jurisdiction under Article 226, stating that it should primarily be invoked for fundamental or legal rights, not contractual rights arising from agreements. The Court concluded that in cases of purely contractual and non-statutory agreements, no writ could be issued to compel authorities to remedy a breach of contract, leading to the dismissal of the petition. en-us Wed, 15 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Dec 2013 18:36:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160684 The Court dismissed the petition seeking directions for payment of statutory dues/arrears of sales tax and other dues/arrears by Union of India and NSIC. The Court emphasized that the petition, essentially a money claim, did not warrant a writ petition due to factual disputes and belated claims. It highlighted the discretionary nature of writ jurisdiction under Article 226, stating that it should primarily be invoked for fundamental or legal rights, not contractual rights arising from agreements. The Court concluded that in cases of purely contractual and non-statutory agreements, no writ could be issued to compel authorities to remedy a breach of contract, leading to the dismissal of the petition. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 15 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160684