<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1071 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241406</link>
    <description>Service tax liability on financial assistance facilitated by the International Finance Corporation was examined under the definition of banking and financial services. The applicant contended that the Corporation acted as a coordinating agency rather than a financial institution or body corporate providing taxable banking or financial services, relying on its Articles of Agreement. Revenue maintained that payments for financial assistance from the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development constituted taxable services. On this basis, the Tribunal treated the amount already deposited as sufficient, waived pre-deposit of the balance demand, and stayed recovery pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:07:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1071 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241406</link>
      <description>Service tax liability on financial assistance facilitated by the International Finance Corporation was examined under the definition of banking and financial services. The applicant contended that the Corporation acted as a coordinating agency rather than a financial institution or body corporate providing taxable banking or financial services, relying on its Articles of Agreement. Revenue maintained that payments for financial assistance from the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development constituted taxable services. On this basis, the Tribunal treated the amount already deposited as sufficient, waived pre-deposit of the balance demand, and stayed recovery pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>