https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241399 The respondent's absence during the appeal hearing and rectification application, failure to submit formal cross objections, and the misunderstanding between reviewing previous orders and correcting mistakes led to the rejection of the rectification application. The decision favored the Revenue due to the lack of substantial evidence and procedural errors on the respondent's part, emphasizing the importance of procedural adherence and legal validity in presenting grievances before the Tribunal. en-us Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:06:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241399 The respondent's absence during the appeal hearing and rectification application, failure to submit formal cross objections, and the misunderstanding between reviewing previous orders and correcting mistakes led to the rejection of the rectification application. The decision favored the Revenue due to the lack of substantial evidence and procedural errors on the respondent's part, emphasizing the importance of procedural adherence and legal validity in presenting grievances before the Tribunal. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241399