<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1061 - ITAT  KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241396</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues, confirming that payments were not subject to disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) and were allowable as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the decisions made by the CIT(A) in both matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:05:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1061 - ITAT  KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241396</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues, confirming that payments were not subject to disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) and were allowable as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the decisions made by the CIT(A) in both matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>