<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1042 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241377</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value in customs valuation can be rejected only on cogent, legally sustainable grounds supported by evidence. Enhancement of assessable value requires record material showing why the declared value is not acceptable, including proper comparison with contemporaneous imports on relevant factors such as quality, quantity, origin, and time of import. Mere reliance on NIDB data or a general revenue guideline is insufficient to justify enhancement. In the absence of convincing evidence that the declared value was not the true commercial value, rejection of the transaction value was not warranted and the proposed enhancement was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1042 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241377</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value in customs valuation can be rejected only on cogent, legally sustainable grounds supported by evidence. Enhancement of assessable value requires record material showing why the declared value is not acceptable, including proper comparison with contemporaneous imports on relevant factors such as quality, quantity, origin, and time of import. Mere reliance on NIDB data or a general revenue guideline is insufficient to justify enhancement. In the absence of convincing evidence that the declared value was not the true commercial value, rejection of the transaction value was not warranted and the proposed enhancement was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>