<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1037 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241372</link>
    <description>The High Court partially lifted the attachment order and directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 140 Lakhs to proceed with the appeal, emphasizing that the attached properties should not be alienated until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The Tribunal considered the attached property worth Rs. 3.10 Crores as sufficient deposit for the appeal, securing the interest of Revenue. The denial of special exemption benefits under Notification No. 6/2002-CE was addressed, with the Tribunal allowing for the appeal&#039;s progression based on the attached property&#039;s value, ensuring the security of Revenue&#039;s claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:04:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1037 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241372</link>
      <description>The High Court partially lifted the attachment order and directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 140 Lakhs to proceed with the appeal, emphasizing that the attached properties should not be alienated until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The Tribunal considered the attached property worth Rs. 3.10 Crores as sufficient deposit for the appeal, securing the interest of Revenue. The denial of special exemption benefits under Notification No. 6/2002-CE was addressed, with the Tribunal allowing for the appeal&#039;s progression based on the attached property&#039;s value, ensuring the security of Revenue&#039;s claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>