<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 942 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160671</link>
    <description>Taxing notifications must be read by their specific schedule entries, and reduced-rate or exemption coverage cannot be extended beyond the wording used. On that approach, polythene sheets were not treated as packing materials within the relevant notification, and polythene tubings were covered only from the later prospective date when expressly brought in. Plastic waste was recognised as a distinct taxable item from plastic itself under the schedule. The turnover finding was supported by reliable evidence and disclosed no question of law requiring interference in revision. The revision challenges were therefore rejected and the Tribunal&#039;s assessment and turnover findings were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:28:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 942 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160671</link>
      <description>Taxing notifications must be read by their specific schedule entries, and reduced-rate or exemption coverage cannot be extended beyond the wording used. On that approach, polythene sheets were not treated as packing materials within the relevant notification, and polythene tubings were covered only from the later prospective date when expressly brought in. Plastic waste was recognised as a distinct taxable item from plastic itself under the schedule. The turnover finding was supported by reliable evidence and disclosed no question of law requiring interference in revision. The revision challenges were therefore rejected and the Tribunal&#039;s assessment and turnover findings were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>