<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 1198 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160657</link>
    <description>A retrospective validating fiscal enactment may cure the basis of an adverse judicial interpretation if the Legislature alters the underlying legal basis and acts within its competence. The Gujarat Sales Tax (Validation) Ordinance and Act were therefore upheld as constitutionally valid. However, retrospective operation in taxation is construed strictly and cannot be extended beyond clear language or necessary implication. On the wording of the validation provision, it did not reopen completed and closed assessments treating milk powder as exempt, but it did bar refund claims where tax had already been assessed and recovered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 15:25:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 1198 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160657</link>
      <description>A retrospective validating fiscal enactment may cure the basis of an adverse judicial interpretation if the Legislature alters the underlying legal basis and acts within its competence. The Gujarat Sales Tax (Validation) Ordinance and Act were therefore upheld as constitutionally valid. However, retrospective operation in taxation is construed strictly and cannot be extended beyond clear language or necessary implication. On the wording of the validation provision, it did not reopen completed and closed assessments treating milk powder as exempt, but it did bar refund claims where tax had already been assessed and recovered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>