<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 619 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160653</link>
    <description>Tax liability arises from the sale of taxable goods, not from the assessment itself, and assessment only quantifies an already existing statutory obligation. A time-barred assessment is therefore unenforceable, but it does not extinguish the dealer&#039;s underlying liability to pay tax on taxable transactions. Payment made in accordance with the dealer&#039;s return under section 10(3) operates as a valid discharge of that liability. Section 11(1) does not treat the absence or invalidity of a later assessment as converting such payment into an excess collection refundable to the dealer. Refund is not available merely because the subsequent assessments were barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:51:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 619 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160653</link>
      <description>Tax liability arises from the sale of taxable goods, not from the assessment itself, and assessment only quantifies an already existing statutory obligation. A time-barred assessment is therefore unenforceable, but it does not extinguish the dealer&#039;s underlying liability to pay tax on taxable transactions. Payment made in accordance with the dealer&#039;s return under section 10(3) operates as a valid discharge of that liability. Section 11(1) does not treat the absence or invalidity of a later assessment as converting such payment into an excess collection refundable to the dealer. Refund is not available merely because the subsequent assessments were barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>