<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 945 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160652</link>
    <description>The court held that the assessing authority had no jurisdiction to issue reassessment notices challenging the grant of set-off to the petitioner, as the issue had been conclusively decided by the revisionary authority in favor of the petitioner and not challenged further by the State. The court deemed the reassessment notices legally unsustainable, quashed them, and ordered the refund of any security amount deposited.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:30:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 945 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160652</link>
      <description>The court held that the assessing authority had no jurisdiction to issue reassessment notices challenging the grant of set-off to the petitioner, as the issue had been conclusively decided by the revisionary authority in favor of the petitioner and not challenged further by the State. The court deemed the reassessment notices legally unsustainable, quashed them, and ordered the refund of any security amount deposited.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>