<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 941 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160640</link>
    <description>The Court held that the cost of spares replaced during the warranty period by the petitioner, acting as an agent for automobile manufacturers, did not constitute turnover liable to tax. The Court determined that the transactions involving spare parts replacements under warranty did not amount to a sale but were part of the original sale of the vehicle. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, granting exemption for the turnover of spare parts used for replacement during the warranty period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:21:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 941 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160640</link>
      <description>The Court held that the cost of spares replaced during the warranty period by the petitioner, acting as an agent for automobile manufacturers, did not constitute turnover liable to tax. The Court determined that the transactions involving spare parts replacements under warranty did not amount to a sale but were part of the original sale of the vehicle. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, granting exemption for the turnover of spare parts used for replacement during the warranty period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>