https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160636 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners in a sales tax case. It held that "jhama" sold by the petitioners should not have been included in the tax assessment as it was not taxable under the head "bricks." Additionally, the court directed the petitioners to collect tax from purchasing departments for bricks supplied after July 1, 1976, unless faced with resistance, in which case it would be inequitable to demand payment from the dealer's own pocket. The decision did not apply to sales to private persons. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Dec 2013 12:53:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160636 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners in a sales tax case. It held that "jhama" sold by the petitioners should not have been included in the tax assessment as it was not taxable under the head "bricks." Additionally, the court directed the petitioners to collect tax from purchasing departments for bricks supplied after July 1, 1976, unless faced with resistance, in which case it would be inequitable to demand payment from the dealer's own pocket. The decision did not apply to sales to private persons. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 24 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160636