https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160627 The plaintiffs established a prima facie case of infringement of their copyright in trade literature, registered trade mark and design registration, so interim protection was warranted. The defence of honest and concurrent user under trade mark law could not defeat the copyright claim, and acquiescence required more than delay or silence. On the record, there was no satisfactory proof that the defendant had manufactured the disputed product for a substantial period with the plaintiffs' knowing consent. The Supreme Court held that the refusal of interim injunction could not stand and that interlocutory relief should preserve the status quo pending trial. en-us Tue, 08 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:16:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160627 The plaintiffs established a prima facie case of infringement of their copyright in trade literature, registered trade mark and design registration, so interim protection was warranted. The defence of honest and concurrent user under trade mark law could not defeat the copyright claim, and acquiescence required more than delay or silence. On the record, there was no satisfactory proof that the defendant had manufactured the disputed product for a substantial period with the plaintiffs' knowing consent. The Supreme Court held that the refusal of interim injunction could not stand and that interlocutory relief should preserve the status quo pending trial. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 08 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160627