<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 534 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160626</link>
    <description>The statutory right of appeal under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act and Haryana General Sales Tax Act was treated as subject to the conditions imposed by the Legislature. The appellate authority could not grant stay or entertain the appeal on prima facie merits of the tax demand; relief depended only on proof that the dealer was unable to pay the assessed tax, penalty or interest, in which case reasons had to be recorded and the appeal could be admitted on full, partial, or no pre-deposit as permitted by the statute. Earlier decisions under different enactments were distinguished, and the contrary view that prima facie legality could justify stay was overruled. Exceptional relief could still be sought in writ jurisdiction under Article 226.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:45:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 534 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160626</link>
      <description>The statutory right of appeal under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act and Haryana General Sales Tax Act was treated as subject to the conditions imposed by the Legislature. The appellate authority could not grant stay or entertain the appeal on prima facie merits of the tax demand; relief depended only on proof that the dealer was unable to pay the assessed tax, penalty or interest, in which case reasons had to be recorded and the appeal could be admitted on full, partial, or no pre-deposit as permitted by the statute. Earlier decisions under different enactments were distinguished, and the contrary view that prima facie legality could justify stay was overruled. Exceptional relief could still be sought in writ jurisdiction under Article 226.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>