<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1025 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241360</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta set aside the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Services Tax Tribunal, ruling that the transportation expenses incurred by a manufacturer for outward transportation of goods did not qualify as &#039;input service&#039; under the Cenvat Rules. The Court disagreed with the reliance on the Karnataka High Court judgment and emphasized that post-manufacturing stage expenses were not claimable, except for transportation between places of removal. The Court found the Gujarat High Court&#039;s reasoning insufficient and clarified that the definition of &#039;input service&#039; did not encompass all outward transportation charges. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was not upheld, and the Court provided detailed analysis on the limitations of claimable transportation charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1025 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241360</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta set aside the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Services Tax Tribunal, ruling that the transportation expenses incurred by a manufacturer for outward transportation of goods did not qualify as &#039;input service&#039; under the Cenvat Rules. The Court disagreed with the reliance on the Karnataka High Court judgment and emphasized that post-manufacturing stage expenses were not claimable, except for transportation between places of removal. The Court found the Gujarat High Court&#039;s reasoning insufficient and clarified that the definition of &#039;input service&#039; did not encompass all outward transportation charges. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was not upheld, and the Court provided detailed analysis on the limitations of claimable transportation charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>