<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1014 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241349</link>
    <description>The Bench dismissed the appellant&#039;s miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in making payment of pre-deposit and appearing before the first appellate authority. Despite the appellant&#039;s claim of depositing the amount in January 2013, the Bench found the appellant failed to comply with the earlier order within the stipulated time frame, showing disrespect to the court order. The judgment emphasizes the importance of respecting court orders and complying with directives promptly, leading to the dismissal of the application due to lack of convincing grounds for the delay and non-compliance with court directives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 08:45:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1014 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241349</link>
      <description>The Bench dismissed the appellant&#039;s miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay in making payment of pre-deposit and appearing before the first appellate authority. Despite the appellant&#039;s claim of depositing the amount in January 2013, the Bench found the appellant failed to comply with the earlier order within the stipulated time frame, showing disrespect to the court order. The judgment emphasizes the importance of respecting court orders and complying with directives promptly, leading to the dismissal of the application due to lack of convincing grounds for the delay and non-compliance with court directives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>