<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1005 - ITAT  KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241340</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed for not obtaining an audit report under section 44AB in relation to professional income received from a partnership firm by a Chartered Accountant. The decision was based on the interpretation that the penalty under section 44AB is applicable to such income, despite the technical classification under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1005 - ITAT  KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241340</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed for not obtaining an audit report under section 44AB in relation to professional income received from a partnership firm by a Chartered Accountant. The decision was based on the interpretation that the penalty under section 44AB is applicable to such income, despite the technical classification under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>