<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1004 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241339</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the assessment order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147, as the reopening of the assessment beyond the four-year period was deemed invalid due to the absence of failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 22nd March 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 08:42:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1004 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241339</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the assessment order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147, as the reopening of the assessment beyond the four-year period was deemed invalid due to the absence of failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 22nd March 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>