<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 994 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241329</link>
    <description>The Indo-UAE DTAA was applied to exempt capital gains from tax in India where the assessee claimed treaty protection under Article 13(3). The Revenue argued that the assessee was not a resident of the contracting state because individuals were not liable to tax in the UAE under Article 4. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision for the immediately preceding year, holding that the materially identical facts required the same treaty interpretation. The treaty benefit was therefore allowed and the capital gains were treated as not taxable in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 994 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241329</link>
      <description>The Indo-UAE DTAA was applied to exempt capital gains from tax in India where the assessee claimed treaty protection under Article 13(3). The Revenue argued that the assessee was not a resident of the contracting state because individuals were not liable to tax in the UAE under Article 4. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision for the immediately preceding year, holding that the materially identical facts required the same treaty interpretation. The treaty benefit was therefore allowed and the capital gains were treated as not taxable in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=241329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>