<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 252 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160609</link>
    <description>Section 41(b) of the Arbitration Act confines interim injunctions to relief in aid of the arbitration itself, so a court cannot restrain the Union of India from withholding amounts payable under other contracts when those sums are outside the reference. Clause 18 of the standard contract, read in context, does not permit recovery or appropriation of a disputed damages claim against a contractor&#039;s other pending bills before the claim is admitted or adjudicated. The practical effect is that an unadjudicated claim for damages cannot be set off against amounts due under separate bills, and an injunction cannot operate as a direction to pay sums not forming part of the arbitration proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 09:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 252 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160609</link>
      <description>Section 41(b) of the Arbitration Act confines interim injunctions to relief in aid of the arbitration itself, so a court cannot restrain the Union of India from withholding amounts payable under other contracts when those sums are outside the reference. Clause 18 of the standard contract, read in context, does not permit recovery or appropriation of a disputed damages claim against a contractor&#039;s other pending bills before the claim is admitted or adjudicated. The practical effect is that an unadjudicated claim for damages cannot be set off against amounts due under separate bills, and an injunction cannot operate as a direction to pay sums not forming part of the arbitration proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>