<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 997 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160572</link>
    <description>Sugar candy was expressly excluded from the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 exemption for sugar, so the State&#039;s restricted exemption validly applied to it. The challenge based on declared-goods treatment under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 also failed because the asserted tax-rate issue had to be examined in assessment proceedings and was not established on the record. A further objection based on the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 was rejected: the excise-sharing arrangement did not by itself render the State sales tax void, and at most affected inter-governmental adjustment. The writ appeal consequently failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:26:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 997 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160572</link>
      <description>Sugar candy was expressly excluded from the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 exemption for sugar, so the State&#039;s restricted exemption validly applied to it. The challenge based on declared-goods treatment under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 also failed because the asserted tax-rate issue had to be examined in assessment proceedings and was not established on the record. A further objection based on the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 was rejected: the excise-sharing arrangement did not by itself render the State sales tax void, and at most affected inter-governmental adjustment. The writ appeal consequently failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>