https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160570 Once the precedent relied on by the Tribunal had been overruled by the Supreme Court, the foundation for refusing a reference under section 42(2) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 no longer existed. The Tribunal's duty to refer questions of law therefore revived, and it was required to draw up a statement of case and place the questions before the High Court for opinion. The refusal to refer was held unsustainable, and the Tribunal was directed to make the reference. en-us Fri, 04 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:23:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160570 Once the precedent relied on by the Tribunal had been overruled by the Supreme Court, the foundation for refusing a reference under section 42(2) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 no longer existed. The Tribunal's duty to refer questions of law therefore revived, and it was required to draw up a statement of case and place the questions before the High Court for opinion. The refusal to refer was held unsustainable, and the Tribunal was directed to make the reference. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 04 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160570