<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 373 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160561</link>
    <description>A dispute is referable to arbitration only if it arises within the scope of the written arbitration agreement and the tender conditions; a claim for immediate allotment of additional timber extraction work, based on alleged custom or assurances outside the contract, fell outside that scope and could not be compelled to arbitration. Interim powers in aid of arbitration are limited to ancillary measures and cannot be used to grant substantive mandatory relief that effectively decides the dispute; a direction permitting execution of the contested work was therefore beyond jurisdiction. The appeal succeeded, the reference to arbitration was rejected, and the interim relief was vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 373 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160561</link>
      <description>A dispute is referable to arbitration only if it arises within the scope of the written arbitration agreement and the tender conditions; a claim for immediate allotment of additional timber extraction work, based on alleged custom or assurances outside the contract, fell outside that scope and could not be compelled to arbitration. Interim powers in aid of arbitration are limited to ancillary measures and cannot be used to grant substantive mandatory relief that effectively decides the dispute; a direction permitting execution of the contested work was therefore beyond jurisdiction. The appeal succeeded, the reference to arbitration was rejected, and the interim relief was vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>